Quasimorphisms and laws

A basic reference for the background to this post is my monograph.

Let $G$ be a group, and let $[G,G]$ denote the commutator subgroup. Every element of $[G,G]$ can be expressed as a product of commutators; the commutator length of an element $g$ is the minimum number of commutators necessary, and is denoted $\text{cl}(g)$ . The stable commutator length is the growth rate of the commutator lengths of powers of an element; i.e. $\text{scl}(g) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \text{cl}(g^n)/n$ . Recall that a group $G$ is said to satisfy a law if there is a nontrivial word $w$ in a free group $F$ for which every homomorphism from $F$ to $G$ sends $w$ to $\text{id}$ .

The purpose of this post is to give a very short proof of the following proposition (modulo some background that I wanted to talk about anyway):

Proposition: Suppose $G$ obeys a law. Then the stable commutator length vanishes identically on $[G,G]$ .

The proof depends on a duality between stable commutator length and a certain class of functions, called homogeneous quasimorphisms.

Definition: A function $\phi:G \to \mathbb{R}$ is a quasimorphism if there is some least number $D(\phi)\ge 0$ (called the defect) so that for any pair of elements $g,h \in G$ there is an inequality $|\phi(x) + \phi(y) - \phi(xy)| \le D(\phi)$ . A quasimorphism is homogeneous if it satisfies $\phi(g^n) = n\phi(g)$ for all integers $n$ .

Note that a homogeneous quasimorphism with defect zero is a homomorphism (to $\mathbb{R}$ ). The defect satisfies the following formula:

Lemma: Let $f$ be a homogeneous quasimorphism. Then $D(\phi) = \sup_{g,h} \phi([g,h])$ .

A fundamental theorem, due to Bavard, is the following:

Theorem: (Bavard duality) There is an equality $\text{scl}(g) = \sup_\phi \frac {\phi(g)} {2D(\phi)}$ where the supremum is taken over all homogeneous quasimorphisms with nonzero defect.

In particular, $\text{scl}$ vanishes identically on $[G,G]$ if and only if every homogeneous quasimorphism on $G$ is a homomorphism.

One final ingredient is another geometric definition of $\text{scl}$ in terms of Euler characteristic. Let $X$ be a space with $\pi_1(X) = G$ , and let $\gamma:S^1 \to X$ be a free homotopy class representing a given conjugacy class $g$ . If $S$ is a compact, oriented surface without sphere or disk components, a map $f:S \to X$ is admissible if the map on $\partial S$ factors through $\partial f:\partial S \to S^1 \to X$ , where the second map is $\gamma$ . For an admissible map, define $n(S)$ by the equality $[\partial S] \to n(S) [S^1]$ in $H_1(S^1;\mathbb{Z})$ (i.e. $n(S)$ is the degree with which $\partial S$ wraps around $\gamma$ ). With this notation, one has the following:

Lemma: There is an equality $\text{scl}(g) = \inf_S \frac {-\chi^-(S)} {2n(S)}$ .

Note: the function $-\chi^-$ is the sum of $-\chi$ over non-disk and non-sphere components of $S$ . By hypothesis, there are none, so we could just write $-\chi$ . However, it is worth writing $-\chi^-$ and observing that for more general (orientable) surfaces, this function is equal to the function $\rho$ defined in a previous post.

We now give the proof of the Proposition.

Proof. Suppose to the contrary that stable commutator length does not vanish on $[G,G]$ . By Bavard duality, there is a homogeneous quasimorphism $\phi$ with nonzero defect. Rescale $\phi$ to have defect $1$ . Then for any $\epsilon$ there are elements $g,h$ with $\phi([g,h]) \ge 1-\epsilon$ , and consequently $\text{scl}([g,h]) \ge 1/2 - \epsilon/2$ by Bavard duality. On the other hand, if $X$ is a space with $\pi_1(X)=G$ , and $\gamma:S^1 \to X$ is a loop representing the conjugacy class of $[g,h]$ , there is a map $f:S \to X$ from a once-punctured torus $S$ to $X$ whose boundary represents $\gamma$ . The fundamental group of $S$ is free on two generators $x,y$ which map to the class of $g,h$ respectively. If $w$ is a word in $x,y$ mapping to the identity in $G$ , there is an essential loop $\alpha$ in $S$ that maps inessentially to $X$ . There is a finite cover $\widetilde{S}$ of $S$ , of degree $d$ depending on the word length of $w$ , for which $\alpha$ lifts to an embedded loop. This can be compressed to give a surface $S'$ with $-\chi^-(S') \le -\chi^-(\widetilde{S})-2$ . However, Euler characteristic is multiplicative under coverings, so $-\chi^-(\widetilde{S}) = -\chi^-(S)\cdot d$ . On the other hand, $n(S') = n(\widetilde{S})=d$ so $\text{scl}([g,h]) \le 1/2 - 1/d$ . If $G$ obeys a law, then $d$ is fixed, but $\epsilon$ can be made arbitrarily small. So $G$ does not obey a law. qed.

3 Responses to Quasimorphisms and laws

Tereez says:

June 7, 2009 at 7:19 pm

Hmm, veeery interesting-reminds me of a danish I once ate. qed.

Pingback: Combable functions « Geometry and the imagination
Pingback: van Kampen soup and thermodynamics of DNA « Geometry and the imagination

	aveliz on Second variation formula for m…
	dc transient analysi… on How to see the genus
	dedusuiu on Agol’s Virtual Haken The…
	dedusuiu on Bing’s wild involution
	Inti Cruz on Taut foliations and positive…